Effect of track pT thresholds on N(live) distribution

In a previous post, I defined the variable N(live) for track/pi0 clusters.  I was initially using tracks that were owned by the cluster, i.e. tracks that passed the seed and shoulder pT thresholds.  I wanted to see what effect these thresholds have on the N(live) distribution.

The plot below compares the N(live) distribution using owned tracks (in red) and all tracks within the dR threshold of the cluster, in this case dR=0.5, w.r.t. the seed track.  This plot was made on the signal MC sample and required that a generator level tau must be present inside the cluster.
Nlive Track Threshold Comparison

As expected, when counting all tracks the mean of the distribution increases.  The increase is relatively small for these tau-tagged signal MC clusters; the mean goes from 2.52 to 2.89.  We didn’t expect this to be a huge effect for clusters coming from taus, as they should have relatively few tracks.  The effect is more dramatic when comparing to the W+jet background, as seen in the plot below.

Nlive Comparison for signal and background using all tracks

We achieve much better separation in the N(live)=1,2,3 bins when using all tracks in the event to calculate it.
–Dan

Cluster Tower Distribution Study

Define a new variable, N(live), which we expect to discriminate between jets and di-taus. The definition is as follows:

  • Extrapolate tracks in the track/pi0 cluster to the calorimeter
  • Count the number of towers that have a track from the cluster extrapolating to the OR a pi0 identified in them AND have total energy > 100 MeV. This number is N(live).

Below is the plot of N(live):

Nlive

The signal sample has more probability to have 1-3 towers live compared to W+jets. ttbar tends to have more “live” towers in the cluster than the other samples.

Next we look in each bin where the Higgs signal is dominant, N(live)=1,2,3

daDefine a new variable, N(live), which we expect to discriminate between jets and di-taus. The definition is as follows:

  • Extrapolate tracks in the track/pi0 cluster to the calorimeter
  • Count the number of towers that have a track from the cluster extrapolating to the OR a pi0 identified in them AND have total energy > 100 MeV. This number is N(live).

Below is the plot of N(live):

Nlive

The signal sample has more probability to have 1-3 towers live compared to W+jets. ttbar tends to have more “live” towers in the cluster than the other samples.

Next we look in each bin where the Higgs signal is dominant, N(live)=1,2,3

NtrkvNpi0_Nlive1
NtrkvNpi0_Nlive2
NtrkvNpi0_Nlive3

It looks like we can cut clusters have large number of tracks and pi0s in all the above cases. The cut should depend on the N(live) multiplicity.

Cut Sets and W+jets expectations

We have defined 3 cut sets

Cut Set 1

  • met>20 GeV
  • hT>100 GeV
  • N(TP0 with pT>10)>0

Cut Set 2

  • met>20 GeV
  • N(jets)>1
  • Et(jet 1, L5)>15 GeV
  • Et(jet 2, L5)>5 GeV

Cut Set 3

  • met>20 GeV
  • hT>100 GeV
  • N(track/pi0 clusters)>1
  • pT(leading track pi0 cluster)>15 GeV
  • pT(sub-leading track pi0 cluster)>10 GeV

The table below shows the W+jets and signal expectations for these 3 cut sets.

Cut Set N(signal) N(W+jets)
1 46.5 212250
2 64.3 392851
3 13.2 19046

Cluster selections and signal/background comparison

The following selections are used to create track/pi0 clusters:

  • standalone CES pi0’s with correction for track overlap, pT>500 MeV
  • seed track with pT>2.5 GeV
  • if pT(seed)<10 GeV use low pT track selection (defined below)
  • if 10<pT(seed)<20GeV use OR of high and low pT track selection.
  • if pT(seed)>20 GeV use high pT track selection
  • seed track cannot be an identified tight central electron or muon
  • |z0(seed)|<60 cm
  • |d0(seed)|<0.2 cm
  • 9 cm<zCES(seed)<230 cm
  • pT(shoulder)>2.0 GeV
  • N(COT hits total for shoulder track)>5

Low pT track selection

  • N(COT Axial hits)>19
  • N(COT Stereo hits)>19
  • N(COT Axial segments w/ 6 hits)+ N(COT Stereo segments w/ 6 hits)>1

Hi pT track selection

  • N(COT axial segments w/ 5 hits)>2
  • N(COT stereo segments w/ 5 hits)>1

Signal/Background Comparison Plots

Met:

Met
Ht:
ht
N(TP0):
nTP0

pT(TP0):

pT
M(TP0):
M(TP0)
M(2 TP0):
M(2 TP0)
MT(TP0+Met):
MT(TP0+MET)
1st mechanical longitudinal moment of clusters:
kpar

New Weblog Created

I’ve talked to Mary and gotten this new weblog.  It has more features and is a whole lot shinier than the old one.  You can register for yourself here or talk to me and I’ll add you.

Scott

NMSSM Higgs Search