Newest expected/observed numbers

After speaking with Henry  on Friday, I’m using the W+jets instead of W+heavy samples to get the 2-to-1 soft lepton ratios.  Here’s the newest table:

Category Expected Observed
DILEP_TCE_eP_eP 339.107 378
DILEP_TCE_eP_eN 702.108 737
DILEP_TCE_eN_eN 357.002 342
DILEP_CMUP_eP_eP 192.871 242
DILEP_CMUP_eP_eN 402.9 479
DILEP_CMUP_eN_eN 205.709 259
DILEP_CMX_eP_eP 119.375 126
DILEP_CMX_eP_eN 236.311 301
DILEP_CMX_eN_eN 114.012 152
DILEP_TCE_eP_mP 34.9529 19
DILEP_TCE_eP_mN 34.5579 26
DILEP_TCE_eN_mP 33.7819 34
DILEP_TCE_eN_mN 38.8574 27
DILEP_CMUP_eP_mP 18.4859 12
DILEP_CMUP_eP_mN 17.1124 23
DILEP_CMUP_eN_mP 19.8476 15
DILEP_CMUP_eN_mN 19.6184 13
DILEP_CMX_eP_mP 10.6777 13
DILEP_CMX_eP_mN 12.6213 7
DILEP_CMX_eN_mP 8.30193 10
DILEP_CMX_eN_mN 10.0776 9

The numbers are much closer than they were before, but there are still issues to fix:

  • The e+mu predictions seem too high, (at least in the TCE trigger) and I just fixed a problem that will, I expect, increase them further.
  • I believe the expected contribution from two conversion electrons is still two low:

  • The soft electron parameterization needs to be tweaked (or I could just cut off the soft electrons at 1.5 GeV):

-Scott