After speaking with Henry on Friday, I’m using the W+jets instead of W+heavy samples to get the 2-to-1 soft lepton ratios. Here’s the newest table:
Category | Expected | Observed |
DILEP_TCE_eP_eP | 339.107 | 378 |
DILEP_TCE_eP_eN | 702.108 | 737 |
DILEP_TCE_eN_eN | 357.002 | 342 |
DILEP_CMUP_eP_eP | 192.871 | 242 |
DILEP_CMUP_eP_eN | 402.9 | 479 |
DILEP_CMUP_eN_eN | 205.709 | 259 |
DILEP_CMX_eP_eP | 119.375 | 126 |
DILEP_CMX_eP_eN | 236.311 | 301 |
DILEP_CMX_eN_eN | 114.012 | 152 |
DILEP_TCE_eP_mP | 34.9529 | 19 |
DILEP_TCE_eP_mN | 34.5579 | 26 |
DILEP_TCE_eN_mP | 33.7819 | 34 |
DILEP_TCE_eN_mN | 38.8574 | 27 |
DILEP_CMUP_eP_mP | 18.4859 | 12 |
DILEP_CMUP_eP_mN | 17.1124 | 23 |
DILEP_CMUP_eN_mP | 19.8476 | 15 |
DILEP_CMUP_eN_mN | 19.6184 | 13 |
DILEP_CMX_eP_mP | 10.6777 | 13 |
DILEP_CMX_eP_mN | 12.6213 | 7 |
DILEP_CMX_eN_mP | 8.30193 | 10 |
DILEP_CMX_eN_mN | 10.0776 | 9 |
The numbers are much closer than they were before, but there are still issues to fix:
- The e+mu predictions seem too high, (at least in the TCE trigger) and I just fixed a problem that will, I expect, increase them further.
- I believe the expected contribution from two conversion electrons is still two low:
- The soft electron parameterization needs to be tweaked (or I could just cut off the soft electrons at 1.5 GeV):
-Scott